Restartnaija

Blog Post

Restartnaija > Culture > Is the TRUTH ALWAYS BITTER?

Is the TRUTH ALWAYS BITTER?

Irritated by the rate of immorality in his environment, a pastor parked to chastise a prostitute standing by the roadside. “Foolish girl, candidate of hell, you are disgrace to womanhood, selling your dignity to dirty men.” The girl got embarrassed and began insulting the man in vulgar words. Later, another man spoke to the lady: “hey lady, I admire your height and beauty; I wonder how you will look when dressed as a banker, nurse, doctor or director.” She blushed, “of course I look good in such attires, but condition deprived me the chance to regularize it.” In many occasions, it is not truth that is bitter, but the intention and approach of the ‘truth-teller’.

The claim “truth is always bitter” can and has been used to impose opinions and labels on people we misunderstand. It has been used to condemn people who seek to defend themselves from extreme accusations. “You are wicked, stingy, gullible, biased and greedy; stop defending it, truth is always bitter.” Some people apply the assertion when perpetrating injustice against others, or when trying to claim other people’s property. And without evaluating the depth of these claims, along with their intentions and approaches, injustice, wars and conflicts may prevail.

What is truth?

Truth is the quality or state of being based on facts.[1] For Aristotle, truth is “to say of what is that it is, or of what is not that it is not.”[2] It is the property of sentences, beliefs or thoughts to agree with the facts or to state what is the case.[3]

Types of truth

  • Factual truth: is the agreement between human beliefs/statements and verifiable reality (past and present events, objects and their qualities). Factual truths often depend on the witness of those who have experienced or are experiencing the events or objects at the specific time in view. E.g., if Mr-A confirms to Mr-B (on phone) that he is driving, the statement becomes true, if Mr-A is actually driving. If Mr-B doubts Mr-A, he could request for more evidence like picture or another person’s confirmation.
  • Essential beliefs: factual truths often vary from essential beliefs, which are held by logical reasoning, forward and retrospective demonstrations. Questions about God, universe, nature, humanity, equality, origin of beings and society may not be proven by direct evidence. But through reasoning and research from factual truths, humans promote essential beliefs as foundations for harmonious social interactions and scientific productivity. And since human beings are limited by time and space, these unverifiable beliefs are held in faith and adjusted by future discoveries.

Concerned with realities like existence, age, origin, past conditions of objects and events, factual truths lay foundation for future possibilities. Factual truths are especially important in tracing history of causes and effects in nature and society.

  • Practical truth: is the agreement between human belief and possibilities (imminent and distant). Heraclitus notes that everything is constantly changing,[4] either substantially or accidentally. When burnt in fire, cloth changes substantially to ash; but when soaked in bleach, it changes only colour (accidental change). This constant possibility of change based on various factors makes humans to wish for favourable changes. It also drives people to study the nature and possibility of things in order to influence their outcome.

So, as possibilities for things, practical truths depend on various factors such as nature, chance, human or supernatural interventions. The probability of practical truth is often measured by a historical pattern of cause and effect about present or related issues. The practical truth about pampered children is that, without serious intervention, they could become unproductive, greedy or timid. Ignoring parents who over-pamper their children is denying them practical truths; over-pampering children is denying them truth about pleasure and pain for happiness; not warning reckless drivers is denying them practical truth about their probably imminent death.

Purpose of truth

All humans seek happiness,[5] which is the state of being in accord with their transcendental nature as moderating agents of growth and harmony in the society.[6] Enlightened minds pursue this happiness by actualizing their potentials in and for the society, while the unenlightened minds seek happiness through reckless or vicious means for themselves. Yet, the vicious means to perceived happiness often bring pain or revenge from the victims or objects, or emptiness of life. Hence, to obtain sustainable happiness from their relationship with people, objects and events, humans require factual and practical truths about them.

Truth is the highest medicine for human heart to attain happiness. It disposes the soul to boldly face the world and all that is within. People need truth about the world in order to thrive[7] in it. While truth is the aim of belief, falsity is a fault that poisons the human heart. Hence, believing what is not true and living on such beliefs lead to unhappiness and harm.

Abuse of truth

Despite the importance of truth in bringing human happiness, truth can also be abused to bring pain and destruction. Two factors that can negatively twist the effect of truth are the intention and the approach of the truth-teller.

Bad intention: using truth, some people are able to manipulate others into making grievous mistakes or to sow discord among people. They achieve this by spreading half-truths, exaggerated or distorted truths and ill-timed information for purpose of slander, discord or destruction. What is the intention of a doctor who carelessly announces his patient’s death to the patient’s hypertensive relatives? Or a ‘friend’ openly announcing another ‘friend’s’ past mistakes (secrets) to suitors, husband or admirers without giving her chance to confess amicably? Once the intention of the truth-teller is not geared towards growth and harmony, the ‘TRUTH’ becomes poisonous instead of healing.

Bad approach: despite the good intention of the truth-teller, without proper approach, the healing effect of truth may not be actualized. Truth is a healing procedure, but some healing procedures like surgery and drugs are not palatable. Yet, since the patients requires the drugs to live, doctors device approaches to make the drugs or procedures more tolerable, yet effective. Otherwise, patients will vomit the bitter drugs or become totally resistant to the procedure and drugs. Likewise, humans resist truth from fear of consequence, change, loss of privileges, uncertainty, embarrassment, insult or from arrogance. Exposing the truth about a person’s fault in public may not result in healing the fault, but hostility from the person.

Principles guiding the approach for properly telling truth

Like effective doctors, good truth tellers device ways of making the truth more tolerable yet effective. The first step in administering truth is to clarify the intention for growth and harmony. This clarification of intention leads to the four (bioethical) principles guiding human relationship and interventions.[8]

  • Beneficence[9] (do good): the truth must be intended to have good outcome on both the recipient and about the subject. Truth is intended to heal or improve people, instead of destroying the hearer or the person spoken about.
  • Respect for autonomy:[10] noting that each person is unique and has freedom and responsibility for his decisions and actions. Hence, in telling the truth, especially practical truths, the truth-teller does not impose his ideas rigidly on others. Once an individual has not violated other people’s freedom, he must not be forced to accept other person’s version of truth.
  • Non-maleficence (do no harm): the truth must be devoid of intentions or methods that damage the hearer or other people’s reputation, morale, self-esteem, conscience, health or direction. Telling armed robbers the truth about their target’s hideout may only result in harm. Denying knowledge of the target’s location at the moment is actually a lie, but the intention is to avert bloodshed. Betraying people by giving away their secrets (hidden truths) is not lying, but it is harmful to them.
  • Justice: the ‘truth’ is not to contradict social justice by establishing the oppression of a person or group in the society. This consideration about truth is more important in essential truths as foundations for future interactions in the society. Such could result in issues like racism, gender discrimination, tyranny and other forms of social injustice.

Requirements for obtaining truth

Like medicine, the process of obtaining truth is often rigorous and requires specific dispositions from truth-seekers. Among the requirements for obtaining truth are:

Curiosity: as a strong desire to know about something.[11] Curiosity often springs from a desire to obtain deeper understanding of the world and things around us. This understanding helps humans to sustain and secure themselves in the society, and to manage their environment.

Humility: humility is the readiness to accept truth whenever it manifests itself.[12] It involves a high level of internal freedom to accept that we do not possess absolute knowledge, nor know everything. Thus, humility disposes human heart to seek and accept truth even in odd places and people like children and subordinates. Humility is seen in the courage to overcome one’s pride, fear of consequence and appeal to authority in seeking truth. For truth does not depend on established authority or popularity, but in conformity with past, immediate or possible reality.

Critical thinking: openness to accept truth does not imply gullibility or absence of doubt and questions about claims of truth. Despite readiness to accept truth, truth-seekers require logical tools to examine or justify various claims of truth. And even as they examine claims of truth, they remain humble to accept truth whenever it manifests itself.

Courage: as ability to do something dangerous, or to face pain or opposition, without showing fear.[13] It is a strong disposition of the mind to confront or deal with difficult or uncertain situations. Courage as a requirement for truth does not imply complete absence of fear in facing the consequences of any truth. Instead, it is a strong disposition of the mind to manage any circumstance that could result from the truth.

Why do people oppose truth?

In war, truth is the first casualty. Aeschylus.

Human decisions and actions are influenced by series of beliefs that are held as true in a society. These beliefs influence the laws, policies, religious, academic and social institutions and interactions in the society. Since social beliefs form the foundation for interactions in a society, some people use lies to twist social beliefs to their favour. And they violently oppose any alteration to the beliefs that favour them in a society. Thus, humans resist truth from greed, arrogance, fear of consequence, shame, loss of privileges and fear of the unknown.

Need for truth in getting a new Nigeria

Africa is known with poverty, disease, hunger, unproductivity and wars. “These wars diminished in number after the turn of the millennium, but their chief cause – the lack of common nationhood – remains. Africa’s nation states were formed by foreigners, lines drawn by Europeans on maps of places they had often never been to. They carved out territories, cut up kingdoms and societies of which they had little idea… Africa’s nation states lack a common conception of nationhood.”[14] The international reference to these countries of unconsented peoples, as democratic entities, is the foundational lie for neo-colonial exploitation.

Before colonialism, different kingdoms and communities in the present-day-Nigeria had their ways of owning and sharing lands among themselves.[15][16] The different families shared lands among the family members for farming and resources for crafts and blacksmithing.[17] Then, British colonialist invaded to subdue and exploit the resources in the people’s lands. To maintain control over all the resources, colonialists merged the different peoples’ lands as commonwealth property under one government, while their experts claim that Africans are sub-humans who are incapable of using their resources for industry.[18] This lie aims to sustain the colonial foundation for using different sections in Nigeria to hold and exploit the others in the unconsented union.

The first step to experiencing the healing power of truth in Nigeria/Africa is to accept that we are not one. Yet, we can be one after distinguishing ourselves and resources respectively, so that each people can use their resources for industrial productivity and eventual exchange.

Human heart seeks happiness (fulfilment);

Truth brings healing and happiness to human heart;


[1] Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, International Student’s Edition. S. V. Truth

[2] Simon W. Blackburn, “Philosophy and logic” in Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/truth-philosophy-and-logic retrieved 6th January, 2019.

[3] Ibid

[4] Heraclitus, referenced by Derek Johnston, in A brief history of philosophy (New York: MPG Books Ltd, 2006), p.18

[5] Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics, Bk 1.

[6] Chukwunwike Enekwechi, “From Human to Patriot” in Restartnaija, 11th September, 2018. https://restartnaija.com/2018/09/11/human-patriot-emotional-mechanical/

[7] Simon W. Blackburn, op. cit.

[8] Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Washington DC: Oxford University Press, 2001)

[9] Ibid., p.165

[10] Ibid., p.57

[11] Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, International Student’s Edition. S. V. curiosity

[12] Chukwunwike Enekwechi, “Political parties and the distraction from development in Nigeria” in Restartnaija, 14th August 2018. https://restartnaija.com/2018/08/14/political-parties-distraction-development-nigeria/

[13] Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, International Student’s Edition. S. V. courage

[14] Richard Dowden, Africa altered states, ordinary miracles. (New York: Public Affairs, 2010). p3

[15] C.f. Mogobe Ramose, “Discourses on Africa” in The African Philosophy Reader, Second Edition, Edited by P. H. Coetzee and A. P. J. Roux (New York: Routledge, 2003). p.3

[16] C.f. Pieter Coetzee, “Morality in African thought” in African Philosophy Reader, 2nd Edition, Edited by P. H. Coetzee and A. P. J. Roux (New York: Routledge, 2003) p325

[17] Walter Rodney, op. cit. p 45

[18] Chinua Achebe, There was a country (USA: Penguin books, 2012), p.157

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *